home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.ecn.bgu.edu!usenet
- From: Ignatius <i-wong@wiu.edu>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: What's the best Win32 compiler?
- Date: 8 Jan 1996 19:48:44 GMT
- Organization: Western Illinois University
- Message-ID: <4crses$mc2@news.ecn.bgu.edu>
- References: <DKtHA0.MJJ@logic.uc.wlu.edu> <30F03DAA.674C@eosc.osshe.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: tty024.wiu.bgu.edu
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 32bit)
-
- Rob Hanson <hansonra@eosc.osshe.edu> wrote:
- >Why are you not considering Symantec 7.2? Does anybody else have any
- >opinions about this. I personally, have been deciding between VC++4.0
- >and symantec C++7.2. If anyone has opinion about this, please post.
- >
- >Robert Hanson
- >hansonra@eosc.osshe.edu
-
- I'm using Symantec 7.2 most of the time. The problems are:
- 1. I couldn't get the extended dos program to run
- 2. The members for DDX for dialogs couldn't be changed
- 3. The button for IMPORT of dll is non-functional
-
- -- ig
-
-
-